Bericht van
LET’S TALK ABOUT TECH
Voor veilige, humane en duurzame technologie
Lees hier het bericht.
Bericht van
Voor veilige, humane en duurzame technologie
Lees hier het bericht.
| Naam | gemeente west maas en waal (projectleider openbare ruimte c s.) |
|---|---|
| Plaats | beneden-leeuwen |
| Datum | 27 augustus 2019 |
Artikel 113, derde lid van de Telecomcode verplicht lidstaten erop toe te zien dat eindgebruikers bij de beëindiging van hun contact de mogelijkheid hebben om de digitale televisie-apparatuur (set-top box) via een kosteloze en gemakkelijke procedure terug te geven, tenzij de aanbieder aantoont dat de digitale televisie-apparatuur volledig interoperabel is met de digitale televisiediensten van andere aanbieders, onder wie ook de aanbieder naar wie de eindgebruiker is overgestapt.
Lees verder “Projectleider van een gemeente reageert op implementatie van 5G”Effects of 5G wireless communication on human health
Fragment: “Questions remain unanswered as to what 5G actually is, what it is for, whether it has impacts on human health and environment, whether it is secure, whether it offers good value for money or whether anyone will be prepared to pay for it.5 As an alternative, according to some experts,6 fibre optics would be more secure, safe and offer higher speed than 5G. However, fibre optics are not wireless.” MEER…
Nederlands:
Lees verder “Het Europese Parlement spreekt zich in een Briefing uit over 5G.”We hebben besloten om voortaan nog uitsluitend het url-adres van deze website, die onafhankelijk is en blijft, nog op de websitepagina van FB te zetten nadat nu pas is aangekondigd dat we nep-nieuws (uit 2017!) verspreidden. Vreselijk dat FB zo voor eigen rechter of voor degenen die hen sponsoren speelt. Maar dit kon ieder moment gebeuren. Bedankt voor het lezen van die pagina! We hebben het nog lang volgehouden!
Lees verder “CENSUUR: De Gentechvrije Burgers, die op FB een pagina account hebben, zetten geen nieuwe berichten meer op deze FB pagina.”The wise words of former U.S. Attorney General, Robert F. Kennedy, seem particularly apropos:
“Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance.” Source.
| Maize MON 88017 EFSA Scientific Opinion on the assessment of genetically modified maize MON 88017 for renewal authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 EFSA opinion: 12 March 2020 Deadline: 13 April 2020 Add your comments |
(c) Name of the product (commercial and any other names)
MON 88017 maize was developed by Monsanto Company and provides protection
against certain coleopteran pests and tolerance to glyphosate based herbicides by the
expression of Cry3Bb1 and CP4 EPSPS proteins, respectively. It is associated with the
trademark YieldGard VT Rootworm/RR21. Gegevens van de fabrikant.
03-07-2020, GMWatch: “Prof Gilles-Eric Séralini of the University of Caen has published a peer-reviewed paper criticising the EU-funded 2-year feeding study on GM maize that claimed to show no adverse effects from the GM diet.” More.

Nederlands: Roep om een door de EU betaalde studie over gentech mais terug te trekken door Prof. Gilles-Eric Séralini van de universiteit van Caen. De studie die twee jaar duurde, beweert dat er geen negatieve effecten zijn waargenomen.
28-01-20 GMWATCH: Dr Michael Antoniou voiced his concerns at the Oxford Real Farming Conference earlier this month. Now they have been featured in an article in The Sunday Times by its science editor Jonathan Leake, titled, GM food: Keep EU rules or risk health, says gene expert.
2-22-2020 GMWatch: “Adding to the list of problems that can occur with CRISPR, a new study shows that when the CRISPR/Cas system was used in a gene editing procedure aimed at inserting genetic material in mice, a high frequency was found of insertions of multiple copies of the DNA molecules used as…” More
Lees verder “Yet more problems with CRISPR – with consequences for food safety”Paper Bauer-Panskus, A., Miyazaki, J., Kawall, K. et al. Risk assessment of genetically engineered plants that can persist and propagate in the environment. Environ Sci Eur 32, 32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00301-0
Fragment abstract:
“New challenges arise in risk assessment when genetically engineered (GE) plants can persist and propagate in the environment as well as produce viable offspring. Next generation effects can be influenced by heterogeneous genetic backgrounds and unexpected effects can be triggered in interaction with environmental conditions. Consequently, the biological characteristics of the original events cannot be regarded as sufficient to conclude on hazards that may emerge in following generations. Potential hazards identified by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) include exacerbating weed problems, displacement and even extinction of native plant species.”
4-03-20 See also here (GMWatch) Spreading the risks: When genetically engineered organisms go wild.